- I am going to be looking at ...
- Discovering that...
- In relation to...
- Ways in which we are expected to write
- Own personal voice- not standardised
- Importance of academic conventions- rejection of this
- Institutional framework
- Way of writing, tone, style, referencing
- Referencing shows where argument and ideas are coming from
- Evaluation and creating
- Surface approach- grade hunting
- Deep approach- independent and interested
patterns in ideas - Broad range of thinking
- Reflection and evaluation
- Evidence deep learning- shown in structure
- Use of jargon of subject easily and in context
- Own opinions based and shown around evidence
- Analyse references don;t just put in
- Quickly show to reader- evidence, triangulation, ideas common to deep learning
- Be precise
- Make point, back up with evidence, critique, reflect
- Be straight to point- confident
- Avoid using the same words
- Rounded understanding of concepts
- Don't use conversational tone
- Avoid vague terms
- Be technical
- Support what you say to make points sound more important
- Don't be worried about writing in first person but try to avoid it
- Tense can be changed to third person- expectation
- Explain chapters in intro in some detail- theorists going to be used- finish intro with conclusive sentence
- Long quote- analysed in next sentence/section
- Paraphrase
- Smaller quotes woven in
- Harvard referencing - estudio help
- 'quote' (surname, year: page) lower-case
- Writer inside book (writer in writer)
- Bibliography should be alphabetised and in relevant sections
- Pictures need to use same referencing
Friday, 29 November 2013
Lecture 4- Academic conventions.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment